Bond vs. Health Benefit.

An open letter to the BOUSD Board and our community from Brea resident and business owner Dwight Manley.

Bond

I am writing this to clarify my position regarding the BOUSD board member’s compensation. The following 12 points summarize my considered opinion:

1.   I view the privilege of being elected and serving on the board as a “volunteer” position.

2.  Our schools have been hit hard by rising pension costs, which has resulted in severe reductions in funding for basic class needs, sports programs, school events and teacher’s salaries.

3.  I deeply sympathize with the teachers that are having to dig into their own pockets for supplies, and parents that are repeatedly hit up with requests for funding.

I especially find the school district’s use of children to be the messengers for these pleas to be unacceptable. Making a child return to class with a signed form saying “No” and having to be involved in a parent’s inability or unwillingness to “give” is not healthy for a child.

4.  As a self-made person who has done well in my life, I feel a responsibility to give back. Consequently, I receive numerous requests weekly from BOUSD students, teachers and parents.

5.  I have extra joy in providing funds for those less fortunate. One example is funding the senior night which runs over $100 per student. I feel every student should be able to attend regardless of their parent’s financial situation. Every student should be able to attend.

6.  Every time I sign a check, I think of the thousands of dollars per month the BOUSD board is taking for their “volunteer” position. Over the last 20 years, this is over $1,000,000 and some years was over $120,000.

These dollars would have a real impact on hundreds of lives immediately. Imagine a free breakfast program with supervision at the Jr High for parents that go to work early and could drop their children off at 7am?

7.  I’ve challenged members of the Board to drop this “benefit” for several years now, and they’ve repeatedly refused.

8.  Again and again I have told the Board that I would support a bond measure if;

a.  They drop their health insurance and only receive their stipend.

b.  A bond be tightly regulated with a sub 4% interest rate; no refinancing to pull out more money as was done in the past; the projects be “front loaded” meaning we get as much as can be built in 36 months.

I don’t like the money sitting around for 20 years unused like Olinda School did; a specific list of projects that improve the school’s ability to teach kids and not have a “Cal K-12” taking 15% off the top to feed to do their work.

The overseer of any funds needs to be a publicly bid process with a sub 10% fee. I don’t want to see bond money spent on fencing etc.; the district already has plenty in reserves to do that if its truly that vital.

9.  Various terms have been thrown around to describe my stance; “political blackmail”, “extortion”, “threats.” Those are all being used to deflect and attack me, rather than staying focused on the only issue at hand.

Kids and teachers are woefully short of funds, and the board, some living in million + dollar homes, are taking those funds for themselves. I equate this to people working at a food bank for the needy, taking the food home for themselves.

10.  Having health insurance for “volunteers” creates a huge conflict of interest. If the board members can’t afford their own insurance – they become dependent on the benefit.

Those that can afford it, besides being greedy in my opinion, would have to change doctors if they lost it, and as we all know, that’s not desirable. Why would we have such a personal, emotional and important thing be injected into a position that requires 100% selfless actions?

11.  Our own City council does not have such a “perk”.

12.  Some say “The bond initiative and health insurance issues shouldn’t be linked.” As stated above, having this “perk” is too personal and too important to not play a role in decisions.

If we have $150,000,000 to spend from a bond, no matter how tight the controls are, we can’t have a repeat of the horrific sale to Hines of the old school farm for pennies on the dollar, by a board that thought nothing of taking over $120,000 personally per year, while supposedly so low on funds, they had to do that deal.

Imagine the district having the $71,000,000 that Hines received from Avalon Bay just for a piece of paper saying they can build 653 apartments on our old school farm. We would not be in this position if they hadn’t done that.

Final Thoughts.

So, there you have the gist of my thinking and why I’m taking this public stance. We can’t waste another dollar on a board member’s health insurance until each and every teacher doesn’t have to send one of those letters home asking for money. Until every coach doesn’t have to send out letters or have players canvas the town for money to buy basic items.

Brea is where my heart is. I’m from here, I went to school here and my mom is buried here. I will be buried here. I will always try to help our community and when needed, step up to defend it.

Thank you.

A Christmas Message To The BOUSD Board.

Well, I thought I was done for 2018 until I came across John Bickel’s email to the BOUSD Board this morning. It provides an honest and powerful summary to the social media discussions over recent days and weeks regarding the Board’s abandonment of the Fanning legacy. I’ll let John’s email pick up the matter from here.

December 24, 2018

To: Gail Lyons, Nicole Colon, Paul Ruiz, Carrie Flanders and Keri Kropke

Merry Christmas to all of you.

I would like to invite you to visit, if you haven’t already, a couple of social media sites to see just how the community is rallying around keeping the Fanning name in the new school title. Nextdoor and Facebook both have been very busy in the discussions about the unproven facts from the Anaheim Heritage Center files, and the James Loewen book on sundown towns. Not one of these sources of info have anything to prove that W.E. Fanning, from California, had anything to do with the KKK in Brea or his role in Brea being a sundown town.

Support for the Fanning name is overwhelming.

The majority of people in this community fully support squashing Mr. Rodriguez and his team and sending them on their way. That same majority is feeling the same about some of you. A recall election at the least could be on the horizon if you fail to tell these bullies to go away.

The way the previous board and the current board are handling this situation, allowing the tarnishing of Mr. Fanning and his name, his family members, is horrible. His legacy being obliterated forever because of your fear to face the bullies and their unproven “facts.”

You are also tarnishing the names of the people who were involved in the decision to honor the man who put Brea schools on the map. Leonard MacKain, another notable educator in Brea, the school board members from then, all fine life-long citizens who are part of the great legacy of Brea education.

Once you make the correct decision to keep the name in the new branding, you must also publicly remove the tarnish from ALL of these peoples names, not just the name of W.E. Fanning.

See you on January 14, 2019, the start of a brand new, sure to be interesting year for the school board.

John Bickel

Never poke a tiger with a short stick.

A word to the wise, I’m difficult to silence… banished or not. In a very small way, my blindsided 30 day suspension from Nextdoor drove home the shock and pain of seeing every word, every thought, every opinion ever expressed on Nextdoor was erased.

BOUSD

Then I thought of William Fanning and drew up short. I tried to imagine the loss of his legacy, the crushing impact on his surviving family and the hundreds of Fanning Falcons who have gone on to serve the community in so many ways.

My little problem shrank away to almost nothing. In 30 days, or less, I will rejoin Nextdoor and press on bringing facts to the discussion and debunking the outright lies that creep in from all sides.

Of particular concern is this nuisance little pack of self-righteous would be activists that use untruthful statements to disparage the reputation of William Fanning. They’ve gone so far as to conscript the support of an author/historian, James W. Loewen, to validate their misinformation and to coop whatever credibility he might have as an academician.

BOUSD

Please take a few moments and visit his website. Seriously… give it a good look. It’s just one page and I’m sure you will have little difficulty forming an opinion about how much relevance we should give him in this discussion.

His original review of the report prepared by Linda Shaw, Curator of the Brea Museum and a well experienced and degreed historian in her own right, was a hatchet job which later he recanted in part when pressure was applied.

Personally, I find him to be functioning so close to the edge that it’s likely he’ll go over the side at any moment.

The BOUSD Board has kicked the can far enough.

I’m casting my lot with John Bickel and the large and growing number of fellow Brea friends and neighbors who dismiss the unwarranted attack upon William Fanning as the specious race baiting attempt to bully the board into making a panicked decision they’ll undoubtedly come to regret.

There is no government by the people without people.

Please, join us.