Uncovering The Simple Truth.

It should have been a simple records request. It could have been a simple records request. It turned out to be anything but.

Here’s the backstory.

green_mugAbout a year ago, not long after he created the “Green Brea 2012” website, ex-Mayor Schweitzer launched his “One Ton Challenge” to encourage Breans to reduce their annual carbon footprint by a metric ton. Seeing a pattern developing, I decided to give it a year, then check back to see how much was accomplished.

As you would expect, the website and Mayor were retired at the same time. The website, which offered nothing of value when launched, was never changed, not one pixel, then Schweitzer pulled the plug a few weeks ago. Time will tell if Schweitzer’s legacy is one of equally unproductive wing flapping.

Getting answers ought to be easy.

On January 14 I filed a simple CPRA (California Public Records Act) request seeking documentation of the number of participants and reduction(s) in carbon footprints achieved in the Mayor’s One Ton Challenge.

Sounds pretty basic, right?

On January 24, the absolute last day the City Clerk could respond without violating CPRA guidelines, I was told, “… due to unusual circumstances, an extension of the statutory 10-day determination period is reasonably necessary for the proper processing of your request.  Specifically, there is a need to search for, collect and appropriately examine a voluminous amount of records pertaining to your request.

pubrec_200Are you kidding? Unusual circumstances? What circumstances? Voluminous amount of records? It turns out that was a baldfaced lie, there were no voluminous records. I don’t believe they found anything because they didn’t look very hard, if at all.

I might speculate that, having come up with zip, they figured it could take at least another ten days to fabricate something.

I reminded Ms. Balz that participants registered through the city’s website and were to report their results in order to receive the Mayor’s recognition. I also reminded her that Cindie Ryan’s Marketing Department, responsible for the website, should easily be able to provide the data requested.

After all, if the esteemed ex-Mayor and others can brag again and again about what great successes they’re having, wouldn’t it stand to reason that someone prepared a report detailing the program’s accomplishments? Apparently not.

If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck…

duck1It could be a cheap imitation of a duck!

The City Clerk’s next response, received in less than 24 hours (not 10 days later after culling through mythical voluminous records) included five documents, obviously from Cindie Ryan in the Marketing Department, all from the early concept development and promotion of the program… none of which included a single thing fulfilling my request.

It’s like Ms. Balz asked Ms. Ryan if she had anything and Ms. Ryan sent the only stuff she saved, assuming it had to answered my inquiry. I can imagine what happened next.

Without looking at the documents (a quick glance was all that was required to verify they were worthless), Ms. Balz attached them to an email, clicked send and thought, “Maybe now he’ll shut up and get off my back,”

No such luck. I wrote back, encouraging Ms. Balz to press on to find documents that actually satisfied my inquiry. At the end of the day she responded, sending me copies of the only three application forms received… yeah, you read that right… only three. I’ll get back to the One Ton Challenge in a minute.

This is why we needed Measure U!

Measure U, amongst other things, was designed to reinforce citizen’s rights ensuring that speedy access to public records is not thwarted by public officials or employees.

The more city hall plays their semantical games claiming requests are either too broad or too narrow in scope resulting in the production of thousands of records… or none; the more city hall routinely gives itself extensions because they were on holiday or because they encountered voluminous records that actually didn’t exist; the more city hall stacks the deck against inquiring citizens, likely violating CPRA guidelines in the process, and discourages citizens from exercising their rights… the more we need to support citizen initiatives like Measure U.

We passed Measure T, now it seems that the City Attorney is about to start lobbying for amendments and maybe even legal challenge to see how much of the citizen’s desires can be rendered impotent. You’ll not want to miss the next Council meeting for that dog and pony show.

Back to the One Ton Challenge.

Three, remember? Only three signups. Brace yourself, this would be funny a la SNL Weekend Update if it wasn’t so incredibly sad.

  • The three lone “applications” included two City of Brea employees and the wife of a City of Brea employee. Yes, they all live in Brea. No, there isn’t what anyone would consider a legitimate “private” citizen amongst them. They represent roughly 0.000075% of the population.
  • Collectively, per the documents they provided, only one of the three reached the 1 ton goal, the other two fell short. In fact, extended to the full year savings, three people collectively only saved as much as the goal for two people.
  • coolplanetEven though the Challenge only reached a tiny fraction of the population and they missed the mark by 33%, the “Climate Registry” saw fit to honor Brea with their Cool Planet Award citing the One ton Challenge as one of the contributing factors. I wonder what they were told about the program’s success?
  • The Mayor’s challenge was designed without the ability to audit progress or quantify the results, which suggests to me that no one planned on following up, reporting results accurately or that they even felt the program had any chance of succeeding.

solar_money_300Add this together with the bogus green theme and website, the questionable productivity of the new power generating turbines up at the Alpha Olinda landfill and the sketchy unverified data coming from the massively expensive Solar Project put in on a sole bid contract by Chevron Energy… and what do you get?

Greenwashing!

Greenwashing is a form of spin in which green PR or green marketing is deceptively used to promote the perception that an organization’s aims and policies are environmentally friendly. Whether to increase profits or gain political support, greenwashing is used to manipulate popular opinion to support otherwise questionable aims.

smokestacks_225The term is generally used when significantly more money or time has been spent advertising being green rather than spending resources on environmentally sound practices. Example, every one of the solar panels installed all over the city produced a larger carbon footprint being created than it is saving through operation.

Put down the Kool-aid!

koolaid-man_150A growing number of you (Brea Matters readership is up almost 300% since the election, thank you very much) are getting sick and tired of the nonsense and dysfunction that runs through almost everything said or done down at city hall. Yours calls and emails remind me daily that you’re not buying the old party line any more.

Good! Now if we can just, somehow, muddle through the next two years, maybe we can put on Council people with real vision, proven experience, no personal agenda or high-falootin’ political aspirations.

It might mean you have to turn off the tv, skip Taco Tuesday once or twice a month and screw up the courage to come down to city hall and speak your piece. C’mon… this is your town for cryin’ out loud… is that really too much to ask?

kool-aid_640

Postscript.

If you’re picking up on the possibility that I might be a bit angry about all of this, you’re right. What part of doing their job don’t they understand?

If you think I’m stretching the truth anywhere in this, please feel free to contact your favorite City Council member. They were openly copied every step of the way. Even if they retreat into that ultra-safe politically correct cityspeak, they will still be able to verify that my account of the events is honest and accurate in every word.

This willful arrogant disrespect for the people of Brea and the continued efforts to block progress in the move towards more engaged, more transparent, more ethical, more fiscally responsible government is without explanation or excuse.

The longer Brea voters allow this deviant behavior to continue, the more presumptive and deeply entrenched the subculture becomes. If this is the legacy of neglect we’re passing along to the next generation, God help them. The consequences will be blamed on no one but us… the folks who decided it was okay to let the idiots to run the asylum.

PS: I have a lot more, I mean a lot more, city staffer’s reading this blog than signed up for the Mayor’s One Ton Challenge. It cracks me up every time I think about it.

4 thoughts on “Uncovering The Simple Truth.

  1. In response to “The three lone “applications” included two City of Brea employees and the wife of a City of Brea employee. Yes, they all live in Brea. No, there isn’t what anyone would consider a legitimate “private” citizen amongst them. They represent roughly 0.000075% of the population.

    Their affiliation with the City (and no, I do not know who they are) has nothing to do with their interest in reducing the so-called “carbon footprint”. Please don’t denigrate them as you seem to have done with the “legitimate ‘private’ citizen” reference. And, perhaps their performance has less to do with their attempts than with the city’s ability/willingness to support those attempts?

    That said, please keep pushing! BTW, Mr. Markman could reduce his carbon footprint by avoiding hair dye (apologies, couldn’t resist as one can always see when he’s had his hair “done”) and “going grey”? Fewer chemicals loosed upon Brea!

    • Ms. Boadicea… first, kudos on probably the best nom de plume I’ve seen here. A couple of other surprise sobriquets offered comments so laced with language not tolerated here their presence was never known. They were offered the opportunity to clean up and resubmit their thoughts, they chose not to.

      To your point, please re-read my comment. I never suggested that they had no interest in reducing their carbon footprint, one in fact did a remarkable job. Distinguishing them from “legitimate” private citizens was not meant to belittle them but clarify that, outside of city hall no one seemed to give a rip about the Mayor’s program. Gaining visibility with your boss can be desirable for many reasons.

      They did what they did for roughly 30 days, the sum of which produced annualized results… not totally achieved results. There were no “tons” saved. They got their thank you letters and little else I guess.

      The true humor in Mr. Markman’s proclivity for pretending to be something other than what he really is… isn’t lost on me.

      Thanks for adding your two cents. Hope to hear from you again.

  2. I believe it is critical to bring out the exact savings, if any, realized by the solar panel project we spent so many millions on. Especially given the current intent to spend another ton of money on a rock garden at City Hall in the name of environmental savings. Not one single state goal can be shown to be supported by the implementation of these “green” programs.

    • Jeff… No one, the city, Chevron Energy or Edison seems willing to allow a third party audit of the solar energy project. In 2012 an Edison rep accidently mentioned a figure well below projections while giving the city some trumped up Greenie award. I believe Roy more did a study, which pointed to the fiscal folly of the solar project, but was challenged on a couple of assumptions. As I recall Roy took a best case approach, giving as much benefit of the doubt as was reasonable.

      The Civic & Cultural Center Garden, based on projected irrigation savings by Bill Bowlus, will take 30 years to recoup design/construction cost.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *