Local media fans the flames.
Thursday’s Star Progress had an article by OCR writer Doug Morino with the headline, “Last year’s city trip to Asia still a hot topic.” — yeah, and it’s about to get even hotter.
The article begins, “Brea leaders are once again catching fire for their traveling ways. First, the heat came from a few residents (cough, cough…). Now, it’s coming from one of their own. Councilman Marty Simonoff said he wants to take a deeper look at how the city’s travel budget is allocated and how public funds were spent during a trip last year by city officials to Korea and Japan.”
Better late than never.
Bless you Marty for finally jumping in, but I’m afraid I have to take a different view of this… it’s not time to focus on the minutia. Getting mired down in the trivialities of the trip will not address the real issue.
The bottom line is that Schweitzer, Murdock and O’Donnell appear to have gotten caught with their hands in the cookie jar.
It’s time to stop all of the muddling around spreading half truths, in an attempt to cloud the real issue, too much time has been wasted already trying to make this junket appear to be something it wasn’t… official anything.
It doesn’t matter if the cookies were chocolate chip, oatmeal or peanut butter. They weren’t for the taking. It’s time to man up.
You can’t just help yourself to what isn’t yours without expecting to pay the consequences when you’re caught. Extremely poor choices were made, they come with a price.
In this case there may very well be a law against stupid.
Is travel the issue?
Not completely, no. There are historically legitimate reasons that require Council and staff to travel. At least that’s what we’re being told. A discussion about which organizations make sense for Brea to join and which don’t should also go on the agenda. Could be some real savings lurking here.
I’m talking about National League of Cities, League of California Cities, the Energy Coalition and the like. I’m still trying to figure out how Breans have directly benefitted from the city’s involvement in these and other dubious organizations, but that’s not the issue at the moment.
Who’s business was it… really?
This whole debacle began when the Mayor inappropriately intruded into the business of a private organization over which the city has never had any authority beyond a minor ceremonial role. How the BSCA and BKSCA choose to settle their differences is their business.
When Mr. Park, Anseong Mayor Hwang’s emissary, came calling, Don Schweitzer should have politely directed him to share his concerns with these organizations. Instead Schweitzer butted in like we were on the brink of some international crisis.
The pool boy wades in.
It’s even more ludicrous that, according to the article, “Murdock fired back at Simonoff, calling his inquiry into the Asia trip a type of politically-motivated vendetta aimed at shifting attention from other civic issues.”
I don’t believe that any more than I believe Brett Murdock is, as he has so loudly suggested, the leading knight on a white horse trying to solve Brea’s unfunded pension liability. What a ridiculous claim to make.
It’s on the agenda now.
I’m glad to see that the Mayor reversed his denial and is now allowing the discussion to occur. Sadly, it’s slated for the study session on June 4th which means it’s at a time and place where the public isn’t likely to be free to attend and unfortunately will not get to hear a full report on the conversation.
Have the courage to take it downstairs!
With the whole matter blowing up as it has in the media weeks in advance, and with the unsubstantiated personal attacks being leveled to further keep the truth from seeing the full light of day, I’m curious to see what sort of preemptive strikes might be made when Council meets next week (05/21).
This would almost be funny if it wasn’t so sad and embarrassing.